Household coping strategies and welfare : does governance matter?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorJha, Raghbendra
dc.contributor.authorNagarajan, Hari K.
dc.contributor.authorPradhan, Kailash C.
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-06T18:37:25Z
dc.date.available2014-03-06T18:37:25Z
dc.date.issued2012-12
dc.description.abstractRural households in India are often confronted by various types of risks — covariate (e.g. natural disasters, economic or political crisis) and idiosyncratic (e.g. illness or job-los) shocks. When faced with such risks even non-poor members of the society can be vulnerable if it has ineffective or constrained coping instruments. This study analyses the relationship between shock types and coping decisions of rural households, and the impact of these coping strategies on consumption using the ARIS/REDS panel survey data. We find that rural households will be more vulnerable in time of covariate shocks. Social networks help to get borrowings from friends and relatives during shocks periods. The results indicate that rural government programs contribute significantly to manage distress shocks. We find that the coping strategies such as savings, getting help from government, technological up-gradation and selling assets increase the chance of consumption growth of households. Other coping strategies such as getting alternative wage employment, getting help from relatives, and starvation are risky coping strategies and, these decline the chance of consumption growth of households. Overall, the results suggest that shocks experienced by rural households are likely to negatively affect their future welfare and more effective social risk management strategies are needed. An important policy implication of our analysis is that the government should provide readily accessible and well targeted public safety nets. The existing informal strategy is not very effective as a consumption insurance mechanism. Although the government coping program is found to reduce vulnerability access to such program is constrained. Expansion of government sponsored coping program is likely to protect households effectively from negative shocks.en
dc.formatTexten
dc.format.extent1 digital file (23 p.)en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10625/52490
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherNational Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER), New Delhi, INen
dc.relation.ispartofNCAER working papers on decentralisation and rural governance in India; no. 14, December 2012en
dc.subjectVULNERABILITYen
dc.subjectPOVERTYen
dc.subjectCOVARIATE AND IDIOSYNCRATIC SHOCKSen
dc.subjectCOPING STRATEGIESen
dc.subjectREDS DATAen
dc.subjectINDIAen
dc.subjectLOCAL GOVERNMENTen
dc.subjectVULNERABLE GROUPSen
dc.subjectDECENTRALIZATIONen
dc.subjectINCENTIVESen
dc.subjectRURAL AREASen
dc.subjectCAPACITY BUILDINGen
dc.titleHousehold coping strategies and welfare : does governance matter?en
dc.typeWorking Paperen
idrc.dspace.accessOpen Accessen
idrc.project.componentnumber105223001
idrc.project.number105223
idrc.project.titleBuilding Policy Research Capacity for Rural Governance and Growth in Indiaen
idrc.recordsserver.bcsnumberIC01-1339-29
idrc.rims.adhocgroupIDRC SUPPORTEDen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IDL-52490.pdf
Size:
228.7 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

Collections

IDRC Research Results / Résultats de recherches du CRDI
2010-2019 / Années 2010-2019
Research Results (SIG) / Résultats de recherches (CPT)