Taming of the shrill - from indicators to indicatorisation

dc.contributor.authorAirey, Siobhan
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-22T14:30:51Z
dc.date.available2016-09-22T14:30:51Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractThe term ‘indicatorisation’ captures features of a complex process that help reveal politics at play: for instance, the indicatorisation of the Right to Development (RTD) points out the attendant notion of neoliberalism as ‘development common sense.’ Part of the larger project “Global Administrative Law: Improving Inter-institutional Connections in Global and National Regulatory Governance” the paper acknowledges the importance of identifying and using suitable indicators to clarify the content of human rights standards and norms. In analysing this role, it asserts that key features of human rights indicators can make norm-generation in a human rights context a highly political process.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10625/55756
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectGLOBALen
dc.subjectHUMAN RIGHTSen
dc.subjectGOVERNANCEen
dc.subjectINSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKen
dc.subjectINDICATORSen
dc.subjectSTANDARDSen
dc.subjectPOLITICAL ASPECTSen
dc.subjectDEVELOPMENT POLICYen
dc.titleTaming of the shrill - from indicators to indicatorisationen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
idrc.dspace.accessIDRC Onlyen
idrc.project.number106812
idrc.project.titleGlobal Administrative Law: Improving Inter-institutional Connections in Global and National Regulatory Governanceen
idrc.recordsserver.bcsnumberIC36-1643402171-148948
idrc.rims.adhocgroupIDRC SUPPORTEDen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
IDL-55756.pdf
Size:
413.66 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: