Critique of the Draft ART (Regulation) Bill and Rules, 2010

dc.date.accessioned2011-07-27T12:48:28Z
dc.date.available2011-07-27T12:48:28Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractSome earlier concerns regarding the nature of operationalisation of the provisions of The Draft Assisted Reproductive Technology Bill and Rules (Draft ART 2010) have been addressed, however the functional relationship between the ART Bank [referred to as Semen Bank in the Draft Bill (2008)] and the ART clinics, etc., still remain. This paper itemizes recommended changes (2011) raised by Sama-Resource Group for Women and Health. The present draft (2010) is not comprehensive and falls short of addressing many concerns vis-à-vis women’s health and rights.en
dc.formatTexten
dc.format.extent1 digital file (5 p.)en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10625/46631
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSama-Resource Group for Women and Health, New Delhi, INen
dc.subjectASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIESen
dc.subjectREPRODUCTIVE RIGHTSen
dc.subjectWOMEN'S RIGHTSen
dc.subjectWOMEN'S HEALTHen
dc.subjectFERTILITYen
dc.subjectSOUTH ASIAen
dc.subjectSURROGATE MOTHERSen
dc.subjectSURROGACYen
dc.subjectINDIAen
dc.titleCritique of the Draft ART (Regulation) Bill and Rules, 2010en
dc.typeWorking Paperen
idrc.copyright.oapermissionsourceMGC signed post January 2008en
idrc.dspace.accessIDRC Onlyen
idrc.project.number104780
idrc.project.titleAssisted Reproductive Technologies : Implications for Women's Reproductive Rights and Social Citizenshipen
idrc.rims.adhocgroupIDRC SUPPORTEDen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
133110.pdf
Size:
111.86 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: