Making a case for reframing narratives of peacebuilding in Africa

dc.contributor.author	Olonisakin, Funmi
dc.date.accessioned	2017-04-24T16:54:21Z
dc.date.available	2017-04-24T16:54:21Z
dc.date.issued	2017-04
dc.description.abstract	This paper examines two main types of violent and armed conflict settings. The first consists of situations of armed conflict where violence ended on the battlefield, such as in Ethiopia and Rwanda. The second includes situations where the end of violence and the post-conflict agenda were negotiated and facilitated either internally or by external interveners such as the United Nations or regional organisations, such as in the case of South Sudan. The study focuses on forms of peace settlement that are able to return to the nation and state building conversations that lie at the root of the conflicts.	en
dc.format.extent	1 digital file (38 p.)	en
dc.format.mimetype	Application/pdf
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10625/56340
dc.language.iso	en
dc.subject	SOUTH OF SAHARA	en
dc.subject	STATE BUILDING	en
dc.subject	PEACEBUILDING	en
dc.subject	POST-CONFLICT SOCIETIES	en
dc.subject	LEADERSHIP	en
dc.subject	DEMOCRATIZATION	en
dc.subject	POLITICAL STABILITY	en
dc.subject	NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT	en
dc.subject	COLONIZATION	en
dc.title	Making a case for reframing narratives of peacebuilding in Africa	en
dc.type	Working Paper	en
idrc.dspace.access	Open Access	en
idrc.project.number	107454
idrc.project.title	Reframing State-building and Peacebuilding Narratives in Africa	en
idrc.recordsserver.bcsnumber	IC36-1643402171-164597
idrc.rims.adhocgroup	IDRC SUPPORTED	en

Files

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1