IDRC. Evaluation UnitAmbrose, KaiaEarl, SarahRoduner, DanielWilson-Grau, Ricardo2013-03-062013-03-062010http://hdl.handle.net/10625/50778French version available in IDRC Digital Library: Cartographie des incidences et la méthode du cadre logique peuvent-elles faire bon ménage?Spanish version available in IDRC Digital Library: Mapeo de Alcances y sistema de marco lógico : ¿pueden compartir un espacio?The purpose of this brief is to systematize some evolving discussions regarding monitoring and evaluation approaches, from a theoretical perspective in some instances, and in others from practice. The logical framework approach (LFA) is often seen as sharing elements that characterize “traditional evaluation,” while Outcome Mapping (OM) leans towards elements that characterize “developmental evaluation.” This material is largely based on the document entitled “From Programme Management to Development Programmes: Comparative Study of Results-Based Management-Outcome Mapping” (Ortiz, 2004).Text1 digital file (4 p.)Application/pdfenMONITORING AND EVALUATIONEVALUATION METHODSRESEARCH CAPACITY BUILDINGOUTCOME MAPPINGIDRCDEVELOPMENT THEORYCANADAGLOBAL SOUTHOutcome Mapping and the logical framework approach : can they share a space?Training Material