Evenett, Simon J.2015-06-102015-06-102011-11http://hdl.handle.net/10625/54244http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/polbrief32.pdfThe table of contents for this item can be shared with the requester. The requester may then choose one chapter, up to 10% of the item, as per the Fair Dealing provision of the Canadian Copyright ActPolicymakers are looking for alternative schema around which to organise economic development strategies, and promoting industrial policy seems to signal an intention to intervene in markets more often. However, signalling is not a strategy, nor on its own does it represent coherently formulated policy. Given the multiplicity of objectives attributed to industrial policy, it may not be able to deliver, nor should it be used as a catch phrase. For instance, popular notions such as “inclusive growth” can be misleading if policy objectives are not clearly stated and linked to implementation and evaluation.Text1 digital file (4 p.)application/pdfenINDUSTRIAL POLICYASIA AND THE PACIFICECONOMIC RECOVERYECONOMIC THEORYSMALL ENTERPRISESSERVICE INDUSTRYWTOGREEN POLICIESPOLICY MONITORINGRESEARCH NEEDSWhat role for industrial policy in the Asia-Pacific after the crisis?Policy Brief