Ramirez, RicardoBrodhead, DalNavas, JoaquinDhewa, CharlesRamelan, ViraZaveri, SonalNyangaga, JuliusQuarry, Wendy2019-10-152019-10-152019http://hdl.handle.net/10625/58199This chapter provides a comparative analysis between the evidence-based principles for collaborative approaches to evaluation (CAE) and those associated with the DECI (Developing Evaluation Capacity in Information Society Research)- hybrid approach. The CAE principles were derived from a research project that gathered insights from 320 evaluators who practice CAE. The DECI principles emerged from an action and implementation project within which a number of partner projects were mentored in utilization-focused evaluation (UFE) combined with research communication. The comparison is meant to assess the extent to which there is convergent validity and to explore the complementarity of the principle sets.application/pdfenMONITORING AND EVALUATIONEVALUATION METHODPROJECT ASSESSMENTINFORMATION SOCIETYCOLLABORATIVE APPROACHEVALUATION RESEARCHRESEARCH CAPACITY BUILDINGCANADAGLOBALComparing the validity of two sets of evaluation principles : adding value to bothBook Chapter