Place for family farming : food sovereignty in Uruguay

dc.contributor.authorOliver, Beatriz
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-03T15:56:34Z
dc.date.available2009-09-03T15:56:34Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.descriptionThesis, McGill University, 2006en
dc.description.abstractIn order to reverse the decline of small-scale farming in Latin America, many social movements on the political left are advocating “agroecology” and “food sovereignty”. Agroecology is an approach that places biological and cultural diversity at the foundation of agricultural systems. The concept of food sovereignty relates to the orientation to international trade. Proponents of food sovereignty argue that the priority of food systems should focus on local producers and consumers, who should also decide how the system functions. In Uruguay, the creation of a citizens’ proposal called “Sustainable Uruguay” has brought together rural and urban organizations in efforts to create an alternative plan for the country. A central principle is the need for national policies for food sovereignty. // I carried out fieldwork to examine the connection between these ideas and the views and practices of horticultural family farmers in a locality in the northeast of the department of Canelones. This region has seen negative environmental impacts from the use of chemical fertilizers and monocropping. It was also affected by trade liberalization in the 1970s, which led to the collapse of a national agroindustry oriented to the domestic market. My analysis, based on research in the region and particularly with an organic cooperative, indicates that agroecology methods have been beneficial for farmer autonomy, health and environmental protection. Several of the local strategies and skills were crucial for making the transition to organic production. // Vital to the relative success of organic producers has also been their participation in organizations to develop markets and to exert political influence. Many leaders of Uruguayan organizations representing small producers point out the cultural value of family farms and critique the production-driven model of agriculture. They demand differential policies for protection of family farms and for the revitalization of rural areas in general. Some rural organizations have begun to explore ideas relating to agroecology and food sovereignty, which push further the critique of industrial agriculture and commonly-accepted notions of development. These organizations collaborate with environmental and union organizations that espouse these views and that are part of international networks, such as those that participate in Sustainable Uruguay forums. // This thesis presents two interlinked elements key to the collaboration between organizations in Sustainable Uruguay: its methods and the framing and substance of its proposals. The horizontal and long-term nature of the participatory methods has been essential to be able to overcome divisions and foster common understanding and collaboration. The food sovereignty proposal has become the backbone of the forum’s platform on agriculture because it is an idea that responds to the needs and demands of the workers, farmers and environmentalists involved. Such alliances may be significant for helping to bridge the rural-urban divisions that exacerbate neglect of the crisis in family farming. Crucial to this effort, I argue, is an understanding of the cultural and affective relations between farmers and their homes and livelihoods.en
dc.formatTexten
dc.format.extent1 digital file (405 p. : ill.)en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10625/39954
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMcGill University, Department of Anthropology, Montreal, QC, CAen
dc.subjectFAMILY FARMSen
dc.subjectFOOD CROPSen
dc.subjectFOOD SECURITYen
dc.subjectAGRICULTURAL POLICYen
dc.subjectAGRICULTURAL MARKETSen
dc.subjectLOCAL LEVELen
dc.subjectNATIONAL LEVELen
dc.subjectURUGUAYen
dc.titlePlace for family farming : food sovereignty in Uruguayen
dc.typeThesisen
idrc.dspace.accessIDRC Onlyen
idrc.project.componentnumber101290010
idrc.project.number101290
idrc.project.titleIDRC Corporate Awards 2002-2003en
idrc.rims.adhocgroupIDRC SUPPORTEDen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
128668.pdf
Size:
5.58 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: