Evaluation / Évaluation: Recent submissions

  • Abitbol, Eric; Rastogi, Archi; Arsenault, Mariane; Rouleau, Esther; Pembleton, Corey; Amery, Hussein (Universalia, 2018-10)
    The International Development Research Centre (IDRC), a Canadian Crown corporation, commissioned this cross-program evaluation to understand if, how and to what extent its strategies and support have contributed to building ...
  • Catalani, Caricia; Were, Martin; Hoth, Angela (2013-08)
    The eHealth Equity, Governance, and Health Systems Integration evidence-based Framework provides a systematic approach to better integrate eHealth into equitable health systems. These fundamental principles are essential ...
  • Buklijas, Tatjana (International network for government science advice (INGSA), 2018-09)
    Terremotia is a parliamentary democracy with market economy. It is classified as a high-income country with upper middle to high rankings in indicators such as quality of life, media freedom, education and literacy. Education ...
  • McLean, Robert; Sen, Kunal (2018)
    Ce document présente une méta-analyse de la qualité de la recherche soutenue par le Centre de recherches pour le développement international (CRDI) du Canada. Cette méta-analyse porte sur un vaste ensemble de données unique ...
  • CIID (2018)
    La Calidad de Investigación Plus (RQ+) es un método para mejorar la calidad en la investigación. RQ+ integra tres componentes: aceptar una visión multidimensional de la calidad en la investigación, tener en cuenta el ...
  • CRDI (2018)
    Qualité de la recherche plus (QR+) est une approche visant à faire progresser la qualité de la recherche. QR+ comporte trois composantes : accepter une vision multidimensionnelle de la qualité en recherche, prendre en ...
  • IDRC (2018)
    Research Quality Plus (RQ+) is an approach for advancing the quality of research. RQ+ encompasses three components: accept a multi-dimensional view of quality in research, account for the context in which research happens, ...
  • McLean, Robert; Sen, Kunal; Etherington, Amy; Wind, Tricia; Martel, Andreanne; Fieldhouse, Emma; Nduwimfura, Sandra (2018)
    La investigación puede cambiar el mundo. Podemos reconocer este potencial en el creciente valor de la inversión de carácter público, privado y filantrópico en la investigación para el desarrollo (R4D). No obstante, junto ...
  • McLean, Robert; Sen, Kunal; Etherington, Amy; Wind, Tricia; Martel, Andreanne; Fieldhouse, Emma; Nduwimfura, Sandra (2018)
    La recherche peut changer le monde. La valeur croissante des investissements publics, privés et philanthropiques consacrés à la recherche pour le développement nous amène à reconnaitre ce potentiel. Toutefois, ces ...
  • McLean, Robert; Sen, Kunal; Etherington, Amy; Wind, Tricia; Martel, Andreanne; Fieldhouse, Emma; Nduwimfura, Sandra (2018)
    Research can change the world. A recognition of this potential is reflected in the increasing value of public, private, and philanthropic investment into research for development, R4D. But with these investments come ...
  • McLean, Robert; Sen, Kunal (2018)
    This analysis suggests that efforts to strengthen research capacity are positively correlated with scientific merit. Contrary to conventional wisdom, there is no clear trade-off between the rigour of research, and the ...
  • Ofir, Zenda; Schwandt, Thomas; Duggan, Colleen; McLean, Robert (2016)
    El RQ+ es un método sistemático para definir y evaluar la calidad de investigación y su posicionamiento para el uso y producir impacto. Es adaptable a contextos, valores, mandatos y objetivos, y apoya procesos de planificación, ...
  • Ofir, Zenda; Schwandt, Thomas; Duggan, Colleen; McLean, Robert (2016)
    La cadre d’Évaluation QR+ fournit une approche systémique qui sert à définir et à évaluer la qualité de la recherche, ainsi que son positionnement en ce qui concerne son utilisation et ses répercussions. De plus, celui-ci ...
  • Ofir, Zenda; Schwandt, Thomas; Duggan, Colleen; McLean, Robert (2016)
    The RQ+ Assessment Framework provides a systems-informed approach to defining and evaluating the quality of research, and its positioning for use and impact. It allows tailoring to context, values, mandate and purpose, and ...
  • Perini, Fernando (2018-06)
    Progress was made in efforts to develop an inclusive global agenda, increase open data capacities in government and civil society actors, and to create instruments that provide quantitative and qualitative references for ...
  • Universalia Management Group (2016-09)
    Les principaux utilisateurs visés de l’évaluation sont les membres du comité de gouvernance, de l’équipe de direction et du personnel du FCRSAI. Cette évaluation a été créée pour les aider à savoir déterminer les résultats ...
  • Universalia Management Group (2016-09)
    The evaluation’s primary intended users are CIFSRF’s Governance Committee (GC), management and staff. The evaluation has been composed to provide them with guidance for determining and communicating program results to ...
  • Kallick, Judith; Acevedo Ruiz, Manuel; Breard, Patrick; McNamara, Patrick (2018-03)
    The project aims to strengthen evidence with regards to connections between the use of digital information networks and economic growth, democratic reform, and educational opportunities in the developing world. The evaluation ...
  • Ofir, Zenda; Schwandt, Thomas (2017-12)
    This document lays out steps for using Research Quality Plus (RQ+) in future summative evaluations, presenting a framework and practical guidelines for assessing the quality of research for development. Referred to as the ...
  • Mayne, John (2017-05)
    A key focus of IDRC evaluations has been on exploring the extent to which the research has influenced policy, practice and innovation. With an increased focus on development outcomes, this brief sets out concepts for ...