dc.contributor.author |
Wermelinger, Martin |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-06-10T17:29:50Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-06-10T17:29:50Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011-10 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10625/54243 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/polbrief31.pdf |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The mask of “green growth” strategies can target or promote “green” production, consumption or investment. Trade policy commentators have questioned whether some state measures (often subsidy-like measures) are a new way to introduce discrimination against trading partners. This policy brief reports the results and implications from the author’s work in progress “Do green state measures make import patterns climate-friendly?” Transparent presentation of “green” policies and detailed follow-up documentation of proceedings can make unilateral climate change mitigation and adaptation initiatives more credible while putting peer pressure on other countries. |
en |
dc.format |
Text |
en |
dc.format.extent |
1 digital file (5 p. : ill.) |
en |
dc.format.mimetype |
Application/pdf |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
|
dc.publisher |
ARTNeT, United Nations ESCAP |
en |
dc.relation.ispartof |
ARTNeT policy brief; no. 31 |
en |
dc.subject |
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY |
en |
dc.subject |
CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION |
en |
dc.subject |
ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION |
en |
dc.subject |
TRADE POLICY |
en |
dc.subject |
GREEN POLICIES |
en |
dc.subject |
ASIA AND THE PACIFIC |
en |
dc.title |
Recent “green” policies – limited environmental benefits and distorted imports : what should trade policymakers do? |
en |
dc.type |
Policy Brief |
en |
idrc.project.number |
105992 |
|
idrc.project.componentnumber |
105992001 |
|
idrc.project.title |
Drivers of Competitiveness and Strategies for Economic Diversification (ARTNET) - Phase III |
en |
idrc.dspace.access |
IDRC Only |
en |
idrc.rims.adhocgroup |
IDRC SUPPORTED |
en |
idrc.recordsserver.bcsnumber |
IC01-1607-10 |
|