Power sharing and political inclusion in post-accord democracies : lessons from Zimbabwe and Kenya
Date
2013
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University for Peace Africa Programme, Addis Ababa, ET
Abstract
Power sharing and political inclusion have long been espoused as solutions for states where
ethnic, religious, or racial divides threaten to undermine a democratic transition. This type of
resolution is designed to provide all parties and social groups a voice in decision-making processes,
ameliorating the effects of the winner-take-all nature of some electoral competition. While
the potential benefits of such an approach have been acknowledged, concerns remain that it is
merely a stopgap device toward violent conflict rather than a lasting political resolution. The
power-sharing and political inclusion agreements adopted in Zimbabwe and Kenya in 2008 offer
lessons on the potential effects of such initiatives on democratic transitions and governance, and
in some respects, the tragedy of democracies in Africa, where a number of conflict situations
emanate from election impasses.
Description
item.page.type
Journal Article (peer-reviewed)
item.page.format
Text
Keywords
DEMOCRATIZATION, POST-CONFLICT RECONSTRUCTION, DECISION MAKING, TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE, POLITICAL CORRUPTION, POLITICAL CONDITIONS, CIVIL SERVICE REFORM, POWER SHARING, CONFLICT RESOLUTION, ELECTORAL ISSUES, POLITICAL VIOLENCE, POLITICAL COALITIONS
Citation
Mapuva, J., & Kamwaria, A. (2013). Power Sharing and Political Inclusion in Post-Accord Democracies: Lessons from Zimbabwe and Kenya. Africa Peace and Conflict Journal, 6(2): 17-31.