Outcome Mapping and the logical framework approach : can they share a space?

Files

IDL-50778.pdf (638.29 KB)

Date

2010

Authors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Evaluation Unit, IDRC, Ottawa, ON, CA

Abstract

The purpose of this brief is to systematize some evolving discussions regarding monitoring and evaluation approaches, from a theoretical perspective in some instances, and in others from practice. The logical framework approach (LFA) is often seen as sharing elements that characterize “traditional evaluation,” while Outcome Mapping (OM) leans towards elements that characterize “developmental evaluation.” This material is largely based on the document entitled “From Programme Management to Development Programmes: Comparative Study of Results-Based Management-Outcome Mapping” (Ortiz, 2004).

Description

French version available in IDRC Digital Library: Cartographie des incidences et la méthode du cadre logique peuvent-elles faire bon ménage?
Spanish version available in IDRC Digital Library: Mapeo de Alcances y sistema de marco lógico : ¿pueden compartir un espacio?

Keywords

MONITORING AND EVALUATION, EVALUATION METHODS, RESEARCH CAPACITY BUILDING, OUTCOME MAPPING, IDRC, DEVELOPMENT THEORY, CANADA, GLOBAL SOUTH

Citation

URI

http://hdl.handle.net/10625/50778

DOI

Collections

IDRC Research Results / Résultats de recherches du CRDI
2010-2019 / Années 2010-2019
Articles (OM) / Articles (CI)
Research Results (EU) / Résultats de recherches (SE)