Oficinas de construção de indicadores e dispositivos de avaliação: uma nova técnica de consenso
Date
2009
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Este artigo discute o trabalho com Oficinas de construção de indicadores e dispositivos de avaliação enquanto uma nova técnica de consensos, especialmente no contexto de uma pesquisa participativa e avaliativa. Para tanto, apresenta as tradicionais técnicas de consenso, bem como o método de Oficinas, trabalhado pelo Grupo de Pesquisa Saúde Coletiva e Saúde Mental: interfaces. Conclui-se que as Oficinas apresentam vantagens frente às tradicionais técnicas de consenso na medida em que aumentam a diversidade dos atores e as inserções sócio-políticas dos participantes, não se restringindo apenas àqueles reconhecidos como especialistas no objeto estudado. A inclusão desses diferentes atores na construção do conhecimento alinha-se à aposta no protagonismo como fator decisivo na incorporação dos resultados do processo avaliativo no cotidiano do trabalho. No entanto, exige infra-estrutura para o encontro presencial entre os participantes e habilidade para lidar democraticamente com as diferentes posições de poder nelas incluídas.
This article discusses the work with Workshops for the construction of indicators and evaluation devices as a new technique of consensus, especially in the context of a participatory and evaluative research. To do so, it presents the traditional techniques of consensus, as well as the method of Workshops, used by the Research Group of Public Health and Mental Health: interfaces. It is concluded that the workshops present ad-vantages in front of the traditional techniques of consensus in that it increases the diversity of actors and the socio-political insertions of participants, not restricting itself only to those recognized as specialists in the subject studied. The inclusion of these different actors in the construction of knowledge aligns with betting on protagonism as a decisive factor in the role of incorporating the results of the evaluation process in the daily work. However, it demands infrastructure for the presential meeting between the participants and skill to deal democratically with the different positions of power therein contained.
This article discusses the work with Workshops for the construction of indicators and evaluation devices as a new technique of consensus, especially in the context of a participatory and evaluative research. To do so, it presents the traditional techniques of consensus, as well as the method of Workshops, used by the Research Group of Public Health and Mental Health: interfaces. It is concluded that the workshops present ad-vantages in front of the traditional techniques of consensus in that it increases the diversity of actors and the socio-political insertions of participants, not restricting itself only to those recognized as specialists in the subject studied. The inclusion of these different actors in the construction of knowledge aligns with betting on protagonism as a decisive factor in the role of incorporating the results of the evaluation process in the daily work. However, it demands infrastructure for the presential meeting between the participants and skill to deal democratically with the different positions of power therein contained.
Description
Title, abstract and keywords provided in English
item.page.type
Journal Article (peer-reviewed)
item.page.format
Text
Keywords
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCES, PROGRAMME EVALUATION, COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH, INVESTIGACION CUALITATIVA, OFICINA DE TRABALHO PARA CONSENSO, EVALUACION DE PROGRAMAS Y PROYECTOS DE SALUD
Citation
Onocko Campos, R. T., Miranda, L., Pegolo da Gama, C. A., Ferrer, A. L., Diaz, A. R., Gonçalves, L., & Trapé, T. L. (2010). Oficinas de construção de indicadores e dispositivos de avaliação: uma nova técnica de consenso [Workshops for the construction of indicators and evaluation devices: a new technique for consensus]. Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia, 10 (1): 221-241.