Evaluation / Évaluation
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Recent Submissions
Item Aplicación de rq+ 4 co-pro(2024) McLean, Robert; Carden, Fred; Aiken, Alice; Bray, Judy; Cassidy, ChristineItem Application de rq+ 4 co-pro(2024) McLean, Robert; Carden, Fred; Aiken, Alice; Bray, Judy; Cassidy, ChristineItem Applying RQ+ 4 Co-Pro(2024) McLean, Robert; Carden, Fred; Aiken, Alice; Bray, Judy; Cassidy, ChristineRQ+ 4 Co-Pro can support the design, management, and evaluation of research co-production. It can be used at any stage of the co-production life-cycle.Item Rq+ 4 co-pro usuarios(2024) McLean, Robert; Carden, Fred; Aiken, Alice; Bray, Judy; Cassidy, ChristineItem Rq+ 4 co-pro utilisateurs(2024) McLean, Robert; Carden, Fred; Aiken, Alice; Bray, Judy; Cassidy, ChristineItem RQ+ 4 Co-Pro(2024) McLean, Robert; Carden, Fred; Aiken, Alice; Bray, Judy; Cassidy, ChristineRQ+ Co-Pro can be used by a variety of actors. These include researchers and research beneficiaries partnering in a co-production effort, but also the numerous individuals, organisations, and institutions that play stewarding roles for co-production. Here we provide four illustrative cases. This list is not exhaustive.Item Calidad de investigación plus para la coproducción(2024) McLean, Robert; Carden, Fred; Aiken, Alice; Bray, Judy; Cassidy, ChristineItem Qualité de la recherche plus pour la coproduction(2024) McLean, Robert; Carden, Fred; Aiken, Alice; Bray, Judy; Cassidy, ChristineItem Research quality plus for co-production(2024) McLean, Robert; Carden, Fred; Aiken, Alice; Bray, Judy; Cassidy, ChristineRQ+ 4 Co-Pro is an approach to defining and evaluating the quality of co-production. It allows tailoring to context, values, and purpose. It can support planning, management, and learning across the lifecycle of a co-production projects, program or organization.Item Instrumento de evaluacion : una herramienta practica y hollstica para evaluar la calidad de la coproduccion de investigacion(2024) McLean, Robert; Carden, Fred; Aiken, Alice; Bray, Judy; Cassidy, ChristineItem Instrument d'evaluation : un outil pratique et holistique pour evaluer la qualite de la coproduction de la recherche(2024) McLean, Robert; Carden, Fred; Aiken, Alice; Bray, Judy; Cassidy, ChristineItem Assessment instrument : a practical and holistic tool for evaluating the quality of research co-production(2024) McLean, Robert; Carden, Fred; Aiken, Alice; Bray, Judy; Cassidy, ChristineItem Traducción de conocimientos en el sur global : conectando diferentes formas del saber para un desarrollo equitativo(Institute of Development Studies, 2023-08) Georgalakis, James; Siregar, FajriItem Qualité de la recherche plus (QR+) : exercice d’évaluation formative de 2023(2023-07-21) Ruiz, Manuel AcevedoItem Research quality plus (RQ+) 2023 : formative evaluation exercise(2023-07-21) Ruiz, Manuel AcevedoIDRC's first core objective under Strategy 2030 is to "invest in high-quality research and innovation in developing countries". To understand progress on this objective, the Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Framework for Strategy 2030 includes periodic Centre-wide RQ+ assessments. The RQ+ 2023 formative evaluation is the first in this cycle. It is expected to provide: 1. Early indications of progress against the strategy, 2. Insights on areas for course correction at the Centre level, and 3. Findings relevant to ongoing programming priorities. There are two main users of the evaluation: 1. For IDRC Management to understand strategy progress for corporate reporting and to inform any necessary course corrections, and for IDRC programs to gain high-level insights on overall research quality in programs and to inform program improvement.Item Global impact study : review(Gamos, Reading, GB, 2011) Batchelor, SimonThis formative evaluation develops recommendations based on lessons that have emerged from the coordination, management, and implementation of various activities within The Global Impact Study of Public Access to Information & Communication Technologies, at the halfway point of its five year mandate. Looking at libraries, telecentres, and cyber-cafés, the Global Impact Study investigates impact in a number of areas, including communication and leisure, culture and language, education, employment and income, governance, and health; to the extent that public use differs from private use, we need to understand these differences, and articulate the mechanisms through which they produce impact.