Pan Asia External Program Review: 2010 / Examen externe du programme Pan Asie: 2010
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Recent Submissions
Item Pan Asia Networking (PAN) prospectus review 2006-2011(Pan Asia Networking, IDRC, Ottawa, ON, CA, 2010) IDRC. Pan Asia NetworkingA sample of research findings is provided from Pan Asia Networking (PAN) research projects. These examples give a sense of the type of evidence that has been gathered by partners under PAN’s three main themes (Policies, Technologies, and Effects). The themes are summarized in a table in terms of objectives, research activities, and expected outcomes. PAN-supported research also aims to be relevant and rigorous enough to influence policy debates and attract media attention. PAN encouraged new researchers in ICT4D programming such as the PANdora distance learning research network, and LIRNEasia (communications policy). This review encompasses a wide array of outputs and outcomes.Item Constatations en bref de l'examen externe du programme Pan Asie(Section de l'évaluation, CRDI, Ottawa, ON, CA, 2010) CRDI. Section de l'évaluationCe texte présente les principales constatations des rapports intitulés Pan Asia Networking (PAN) Prospectus Review 2006-2011, préparé par l'équipe du programme Pan Asie, et Pan Asia Networking External Panel Review, rédigé par Beth Kolko, Tim Unwin et Dieter Zinnbauer en août 2010. On peut obtenir le texte intégral de ces rapports en s'adressant à la Section de l'évaluation du CRDI.Item External review of the Pan Asia Networking Program(Evaluation Unit, IDRC, Ottawa, ON, CA, 2010) IDRC. Evaluation UnitThis findings brief is based on the reports "Pan Asia Networking (PAN) Prospectus Review 2006-2011" by the Pan Asia Networking program, and "Pan Asia Networking External Panel Review" by Beth Kolko, Tim Unwin, and Dieter Zinnbauer with support of Emily Taylor, August 2010. The full reports are available from IDRC's Evaluation Unit.Item Pan Asia Networking external panel review(2010) Kolko, Beth; Unwin, Tim; Zinnbauer, DieterThe review panel’s overwhelming conclusion is that the implementation of the Pan Asia Networking (PAN) prospectus was indeed appropriate, and that the program adapted flexibly and with agility to evolving circumstances in the rapidly changing field of ICT4D. The report focuses primarily on the internal aspects of the program, and does not reach broader conclusions as to the wider influence which PAN might have on the field of ICT4D more generally in Asia.